Talk:Foundation for Biomedical Research

Edit note

User: Hoyas777 visited and deleted referenced material with minimal explanation, removed links, the end sections and the badge. However, they added a few links which may be useful.--Bob Burton 16:00, 28 September 2009 (EDT)

• http://www.fbresearch.org/AboutFBR/FBRBoardandPresident/tabid/441/Default.aspx
• http://www.nabr.org/AboutNABR/tabid/373/Default.aspx
• http://www.policydirections.com/expertise.php

One of the sections deleted by Hoyas777 were the following pars. On balanace, I agree that the page should primarily be about the organisiation and the views it promotes. If it defends vivesection then a link to another page addressing the debate would be more appropriate than a long section critiquing vivesection on what is a profile on an organisation.

response

Replaced pars w/ following:

The vivisection "debate"

See also animal testing, section 6 on vivisection debate.

Lisa 9/28

Financials

FBR's 2007 annual IRS retrn is here http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2007/042/746/2007-042746997-04a52bf3-9.pdf