Portal:Water

From SourceWatch
Revision as of 13:54, 14 September 2012 by Sara Jerving (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
edit  

The Water Portal

Learn more about the threat drilling for methane gas poses to fresh water.

Welcome to the water initiative of the Center for Media and Democracy, which includes a special focus on the threats to our rivers, watersheds, and fresh water supplies from drilling for shale oil and gas using the hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" technique, without adequate protections, in the Marcellus Shale region of the Northeastern U.S. and other states across the country.

What is hydraulic fracturing or "fracking"?

Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” is a process used to extract deposits of gas and oil from shale. After a well is drilled, millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are injected under high pressures, which fractures the shale and allows for the release of the oil and gas. This is a new technique that allows access to shale deposits that were previously inaccessible through conventional drilling. This practice has become highly controversial over the past few years because of mounting evidence that it contaminates local water supplies and poses risks to the health of local residents and the environment.


edit  

Why Worry about Fracking

Advancements in technology over the past few decade have made drilling horizontal wells for "natural" gas and oil more economically efficient. These new techniques allow greater access to untapped shale than was available with a conventional vertical well, and can be "fracked" numerous times. A combination of this new technology, as well as vast deposits of "natural" gas in the U.S., has brought the practice of fracking to 31 states. There were more than 493,000 active "natural" gas wells in the U.S. in 2009, which is almost double the number in 1990. Around 90 percent of these have used fracking.

Map of Marcellus Shale Region
Map of Marcellus Shale Region
The Marcellus Shale is a mass of shale deposits in New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and neighboring states. As one of the largest "natural" gas fields in North America, it is one of the top targets of the gas industry. Energy companies have honed in on the region, as well as in other major shale deposits throughout the country, including the Haynesville Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Eagle Ford Shale and Barnett Shale.

Fracking involves injecting huge amounts of water, sand and chemicals into the ground at high pressures to break up rock formations and release the gas and oil. In December 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency linked fracking to groundwater contamination for the first time in Wyoming. The agency is currently undergoing a multiyear national study of the effects the process has on water supplies.

Fracking is not regulated by federal statutes governing water safety, because industry lobbyists obtained an exemption from this law, known as the "Halliburton loophole." Although no complete list of the chemicals used by each drilling company exists, information obtained from environmental clean-up sites demonstrates toxic substances.

An April 2011 report filed with the U.S. House of Representatives, showed that 29 chemicals used in some 650 different fracking products are carcinogens, regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act for their risks to human health, and/or hazardous air pollutants.

An investigation by the New York Times in February 2011, based off of thousands of internal EPA documents "reveal that the wastewater, which is sometimes hauled to sewage plants not designed to treat it and then discharged into rivers that supply drinking water, contains radioactivity at levels higher than previously known, and far higher than the level that federal regulators say is safe for these treatment plants to handle.

Other documents and interviews show that many E.P.A. scientists are alarmed, warning that the drilling waste is a threat to drinking water in Pennsylvania. Their concern is based partly on a 2009 study, never made public, written by an E.P.A. consultant who concluded that some sewage treatment plants were incapable of removing certain drilling waste contaminants and were probably violating the law."

In a March 2012 Rolling Stones piece, the journalists writes: "An even larger threat is the flowback waste that is pumped out after a well is fracked. It's a salty brine, mildly radioactive, and laced not just with toxic chemicals but with natural hydrocarbons and heavy metals like barium and benzene, which are known carcinogens even in minute quantities."

According to a piece published in ProPublica, three company spokespeople and a regulatory official said that as much as 85% of the fluids used during hydraulic fracturing is regularly left after wells are drilled in the Marcellus Shale. According to the article, this means that "for each modern gas well drilled in the Marcellus and places like it, more than 3 million gallons of chemically tainted wastewater could be left in the ground forever. Drilling companies say that chemicals make up less than 1 percent of that fluid. But by volume, those chemicals alone still amount to 34,000 gallons in a typical well."

Impact of fracking on wildlife have been documented in a 900 page Environmental Impact Statement filed by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation in September 2011.

Environmental reporter and activist Iris Marie Bloom has been interviewing residents in Pennsylvania to document how fracking has impacted them. In February 2012, she reports on Janet McIntyre's experience who lives in an area where she is surrounded by 30 gas wells: "Janet described her own water as foaming out of the tap on two occasions, which she refers to as “attacks” because it felt their water was under attack by the gas drilling company. She said it was purple. Other residents have reported their water turning orange, red, and brown."

edit  

"Gasland": the New Silent Spring

Gasland the Movie.jpg

Gasland is a 2010 movie directed by American filmmaker and environmental activist Josh Fox. The film exposes the dangers of drilling for shale oil and gas in the United States and features communities that have been impacted.

Fox began working on the film after he received a letter from a "natural" gas company offering to lease his family's property in northeast Pennsylvania. Fox documented communities across the country where drilling had already commenced. He found individuals who were able to ignite the head of their faucets on fire from the chemicals seeping through the pipes. He also found individuals suffering from health issues which they attributed to a contaminated well. Fox discovered residents who reported having obtained a court injunction or settlement from gas companies to replace or purify water supplies.

Fox won an Emmy Award for Outstanding Directing for Nonfiction Programming in 2011 for the film, and it was a nominee for Best Documentary at the Academy Awards the same year. Fox's production company, "The International WOW Company," describes the movie as an effort to document the impacts as "the largest domestic natural gas drilling boom in history has swept across the United States. What is uncovered is truly shocking--water that can be lit on fire right out of the sink, chronically ill residents of drilling areas from disparate locations in the US all with the same mysterious symptoms, huge pools of toxic waste that kill cattle and vegetation well blowouts and huge gas explosions consistently covered up by state and federal regulatory agencies."

Robert Koehler of Variety referred to the film as “one of the most effective and expressive environmental films of recent years… "Gasland" may become to the dangers of natural gas drilling what Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" was to DDT.” Bloomberg News critic Dave Shiflett wrote that Fox "may go down in history as the Paul Revere of fracking."

Immediately upon the film's release, Energy In Depth issued a paper claiming to "debunk" the film's documentary evidence. Kevin Grandia, former editor of DeSmogBlog, in an article written on the Huffington Post titled "Who are the spin doctors behind the attack on Gasland?," stated "[I]t looks like Gasland is starting to get under the skin of the oil and gas industry. I guess the dinosaurs in the dirty fuel lobby don't like videos of people who can light their tap water on fire after their wells are contaminated with methane gas."

Energy in Depth (EID) is a pro-oil-and-gas drilling industry front group formed by the American Petroleum Institute, the Petroleum Association of America and dozens of additional industry organizations for the purpose of denouncing the FRAC Act proposed by Colorado U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette to regulate underground fracking fluids. They have crafted an entire campaign to delegitimize Fox's film, coining itself "Debunking Gasland." Many Facebook and Google users have even reported "Debunking Gasland" ads popping up on those respective websites. ‎Josh Fox has responded to these claims in a piece titled "Affirming Gasland." The 41-page report was co-written with Weston Wilson of the Environmental Protection Agency, Professor Anthony Ingraffea of Cornell University, and Barbara Arrindell of Damascus Citizens for Sustainability, among others. The document addresses industry smear campaign talking points. seen here.

The film has played an instrumental role in fueling activism against fracking, which has even been acknowledged by the gas industry. In September 2011, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Colorado Oil & Gas Association Tisha Conoly-Schuller said she hates to credit the film, but notes that Gasland has played a key role growing opposition to the practice: "These nuts make up 90 percent of our population so we can't call them nuts any more." She then advised the industry to make fracking "hipper" to appeal to young people and reframe the debate in terms of jobs and the economy.

Fox is currently filming a follow-up to Gasland. Fox told the Center for Media and Democracy that this film will focus on the "pollution in our government," rather than the pollution in our ground. "The gas industry has been successful in purchasing our government and has bought its way into conversations on energy, drowning out voices of citizens," he said. "It's shameful and its criminal."

For his latest project, Fox looked at the hazards of fracking not only in the U.S., but globally. It will include footage from drilling sites in Europe, Africa, and Australia. While producing the film, he discovered that the outrage against hydraulic fracturing is global. France has banned fracking, there is a moratorium in South Africa against it and growing opposition in places like the United Kingdom and Canada.

Fox released a short film in June 2012 targeting New York Governor Andrew Cuomo for his plan to open up certain parts of the state to hydraulic fracturing or "fracking." The 18-minute film calls out Cuomo on recent revelations that his administration plans to open up a few counties in the state to be fracked -- which critics say targets economically distressed parts of the states. The film also exposes oil and gas industry internal documents which detail concerns about well safety and water contamination.

Learn more about Gasland on its website, Facebook and Twitter account.

Another film changing the terms of the debate on fracking is called "Split Estate."

edit  

Highlighted Heroes

Josh Fox
Josh Fox is the director of the groundbreaking documentary Gasland. In the film, Fox unmasks shocking revelations--water that can be lit on fire from the sink faucet, chronically ill residents of drilling areas from disparate locations in the U.S. all with the same mysterious symptoms, huge pools of toxic waste that kill cattle and vegetation well blowouts, and huge gas explosions consistently covered up by state and federal regulatory agencies. More information on Josh can be seen on the Gasland website.
Abrahm Lustgarten
Abrahm Lustgarten is an investigative reporter for Pro Publica, a nonprofit investigative journalism news organization. Lustgarten's reporting on fracking has been instrumental in uncovering a plethora of information about "natural" gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale. His work on the issue has been compared to that of journalist Jeremy Scahill on the wrongdoings of Blackwater. Lustgarten was a 2009 recipient of a George Polk Award for Environmental Reporting for documenting the deadly side effects of hydrofracking. Lustgarten's reporting on the Marcellus Shale can be seen on the Pro Publica site. He can be followed on Twitter at @AbrahamL.
Mark Ruffalo
Mark Ruffalo is an outspoken anti-drilling activist, as well as an actor, most famous for his roles in the movies Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Zodiac, Shutter Island, The Kids Are All Right, Just Like Heaven, Rumor Has It and You Can Count On Me. As an activist, he has been noted for his tenacity in fighting against fracking in the Marcellus Shale. As a result, Ruffalo was placed on a terrorist watch list by the Pennsylvania Office of Homeland Security after showing a screening of the movie Gasland at a public forum in Pennsylvania. This was reported by both the San Francisco Chronicle and Time Magazine. Many of his articles in opposition to fracking can be seen on the Huffington Post website. He can be followed on Twitter at @mruff221.
Sandra Steingraber

Sandra Steingraber is an acclaimed ecologist and author of “Raising Elijah” -- a book on how to raise a child in an age of environmental hazards. In 2011, the author won a Heinz award -- which recognizes individuals for their contributions in areas including the environment -- for her work on environmental toxins. She dedicated the $100,000 prize to the fight against fracking. In response to receiving the award, Steingraber describes why the fight against fracking is a top priority: "Fracking turns fresh water into poison. It fills our air with smog, our roadways with eighteen-wheelers hauling hazardous materials, and our fields and pastures with pipelines and toxic pits... The bodies of my children are the rearranged molecules of the air, water, and food streaming through them. As their mother, there is no more important investment that I could make right now than to support the fight for the integrity of the ecological system that makes their lives possible."

edit  

(In)Famous Supporters

Dick Cheney
Dick Cheney: In 2005, the U.S. Congress exempted fracking from regulation under the Safe Water Drinking Act, in what is known as the "Halliburton Loophole." This move was widely perceived as having been pushed forth by Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force. Cheney is the former CEO of Halliburton, a Houston-based oilfield services company.
T Boone Pickens
T. Boone Pickens: In 2011, Texas oil industry figure T Boone Pickens pushed his Pickens Plan to the National Press Club. His plan was to have U.S. taxpayers pay for billions in government subsidies for vehicles that run on "natural" gas. Launched in July 2008, the plan promotes "energy independence" in the name of "national security." Originally a combination of the promotion of shale gas drilling and wind energy, the plan has transformed into the promotion of gas drilling exclusively. Pickens was influential in the introduction of the 2011 NAT GAS Act. Pickens is also a big proponent of water privitization and owns Mesa Water. He is the owner of the energy hedge fund BP Capital and the author of two autobiographies."
Aubrey McClendon
Aubrey McClendon is the CEO of Chesapeake Energy. He is also in the chair of the board of directors of the front group American Clean Skies Foundation. The channel produces what is notoriously known as Branded News. He is also a Managing Partner and Founder of Deep Fork Capital. He has been a Director of Chesapeake Energy Corp. since 1989. At the 2011 winter meeting for the Independent Oil and Gas Association, McClendon stated that Chesapeake planned on investing some $40-50 billion in methane gas drilling in West Virginia in the next few decades. He also stated that Chesapeake had already spent some $600 million in capital investment since 2008 in the state. McClendon received a salary of $21 million in 2010.
Kathryn Klaber
Kathryn Klaber: Kathryn Klaber is the President and Executive Director of the Marcellus Shale Coalition (and the former Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Economy League). The coalition fights against environmental protections of areas impacted by shale gas and oil drilling. It is engaged in extensive state and federal lobbying campaigns to protect the financial interests of its corporate members. In an interview with the "Clean Skies TV Network," a channel affiliated with the American Clean Skies Foundation (which is largely funded from profits from gas drilling), Klaber stated that claims of toxins entering peoples' oil wells from fracking are unfounded. This comment was made despite the fact that investigative journalists and scientists have documented the contamination. Klaber also stated that the FRAC Act was unnecessary because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency already has regulations in place to protect the environment. She neglected to mention that the chemicals used in shale oil and gas drilling are not regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act, as a result of the Halliburton loophole.
Tom Corbett
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett: Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett reportedly roped in nearly $1 million from the oil and gas industry during his 2010 gubernatorial campaign. He has since pushed for the expansion of drilling in the state, including a recent effort to push neighboring states to open up the Delaware River basin to fracking, which was thwarted by Delaware Governor Jack Markell in November who said the plan did not address public health protections. Tom Corbett’s first major political appointment after his election in November 2010 was to name C. Alan Walker, an energy company executive, to head the Department of Community and Economic Development. Corbett also repealed environmental assessments of gas wells in state parks. Within the budget bill, Corbett authorized Walker to “expedite any permit or action pending in any agency where the creation of jobs may be impacted.” In early February 2012, the Pennsylvania House and Senate approved a plan (Act 13) for a "local impact fee" on natural gas drillers, which Gov. Corbett signed into law on February 14. Corbett had refused to impose a "severance tax" on drillers, arguing that it would hinder the industry's presence in the state, so instead the "impact fee" was created. The compromise calls for a fee that would fluctuate with the price of natural gas and, starting in 2013, the rate of inflation.[1]
edit  

The Halliburton Loophole

In 2005, the U.S. Congress exempted fracking from regulation under the Safe Water Drinking Act, in what is known as the "Halliburton Loophole." In 2001, Vice President Dick Cheney's "energy task force" touted the benefits of hydrofracking, while redacting references to human health hazards associated with the practice. Cheney is the former CEO of Halliburton, which reportedly earns $1.5 billion a year from its energy operations, which relies substantially on its hydrofracking business.

The year before, the EPA undertook a study on the issue and "the EPA, despite its scientific judgment that there was a potential risk to groundwater supplies, which their report clearly says, then went ahead and very surprisingly concluded that there was no risk to groundwater," Lustgarten said on Democracy Now! in September 2009. "[P]art of my reporting found that throughout that process the EPA was closer than seemed comfortable with the industry. I filed Freedom of Information Act requests for some documents and found conversations between Halliburton employees and the EPA researchers, essentially asking for an agreement from Halliburton in exchange for more lax enforcement. The EPA, in these documents, appeared to offer that and agree to that. And it doesn’t appear, by any means, to have been either a thorough or a very objective study."

edit  

Fracking Front Groups

Here are some of the industry front groups and trade groups advocating for fracking:

  • Energy in Depth (EID): Energy in Depth is a pro oil-and-gas drilling industry front group formed by the American Petroleum Institute, the Petroleum Association of America and dozens of additional industry organizations for the purpose of denouncing legislation proposed by Colorado U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette to regulate underground hydrofracking fluids. Energy in Depth denounced DeGette's proposed fracking legislation as an “unnecessary financial burden on a single small-business industry, American oil and natural gas producers.” In June, 2009, Energy in Depth started a multimillion dollar lobbying and public relations campaign aimed at derailing public health legislation that would require the disclosure of the chemicals used in fracking fluids. In addition to a website, EID's campaign includes a Twitter feed, a Facebook group, a YouTube channel and an aggressive advertising campaign. Shortly before the documentary Gasland first aired on HBO, the organization issued a "Gasland Debunked" portal on its site to discredit the film and its director, but skips over many of the key facts. Fox, along with numerous scientists and academics, penned a 40-page document titled "Affirming Gasland" in response to "Debunking Gasland." After Josh Fox's film was nominated for the Academy Award, Energy in Depth went on the attack again, writing a press release titled, “This nomination is fitting, as the Oscars are aimed at praising pure entertainment.” The Guardian debunked the response.
  • Joint Landowners Coalition of New York (JLCNY): The JLCNY is overwhelmingly supportive of industry drilling into the Marcellus Shale. JLNY describes itself as "a 501c 6 a non-for-profit corporation." It says it "represent[s] 17 counties and 37+ coalitions. Estimated numbers of households are currently over 20,000, representing approximately 70,000 people and over 800,000 acres throughout New York's Southern Tier." Like EID, JNLY has its own "Debunking Gasland page.
  • Marcellus Shale Coalition: Marcellus Shale Coalition is a well-funded industry group that is working to oppose efforts to regulate fracking and block efforts to protect drinking water.
  • NGVehicles: NGVehicles, also known as Clean Natural Gas Vehicles, is an industry-funded lobbying organization. The Center for Media and Democracy revealed that they were instrumental in writing the NAT GAS Act that was unveiled by the US Congress in April 2011.
edit  

Featured Videos

"The Sky is Pink" Gasland Director Josh Fox Addresses New York Governor Andrew Cuomo about Drilling in New York


"Gasland" Director Josh Fox Arrested at Congressional Hearing on Natural Gas Fracking


Kill the Drill Video- New York City's Water Supply


Ignitible Water


The Fracking Song


edit  

Interesting Pieces

  • Democracy Now! interview with ProPublica investigative reporter Abrahm Lustgarten summarizing some of the key concerns with drilling for shale gas.
edit  

Groups Against Fracking

Gasland's webpage also maintains an entire database of activist organizations, organized by state.

edit  

Latest News


edit  

Pending Federal Legislation

In March 2011, Representatives Diana DeGette, Jared Polis and Maurice Hinchey and Senator Bob Casey introduced the Fracking Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act (FRAC ACT), which is a re-introduction of the 2009 version of the bill that was tabled. The act is aimed at closing the Halliburton loophole and requiring the oil and gas industry to disclose the chemicals used in drilling projects. It "amends the Safe Drinking Water Act to: (1) repeal the exemption from restrictions on underground injection of fluids near drinking water sources granted to hydraulic fracturing operations under such Act; and (2) require oil and gas companies to disclose the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing operations." The FRAC Act has 9 co-sponsors in the Senate. Predictably, the gas and oil industries pose a strong voice of opposition to the FRAC Act. As of March 2012, neither of the FRAC Act bills in the House or Senate has been passed.

In March 2009, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minnesota) proposed the Fast Track Shale Act. The bill calls for an "open[ing] of Federal Bureau of Land Management and National Forest lands to leasing for exploration, development, and production of oil shale resources, and for other purposes." On the same day this bill was introduced, Bachmann and Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-North Carolina) also introduced what they called the "Emergency Energy Cut the Red Tape Now Act of 2009," essentially calling for the suspension of all environmental regulation for the sake of exploiting environmental resources. The bill bluntly proposes "to terminate or provide for suspension of the application of Federal laws that restrict exploration, development, or production of oil, gas, or oil shale, to facilitate the construction of new crude oil refineries, and for other purposes." The bill was not passed.

In April 2011, the U.S. House of Representatives unveiled the NAT GAS Act, also known as the "New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act," which would offer the fracking industry tax credits to help "drive" consumption. The bigger the vehicle, the more tax credits given. It is the culmination of 2+ years of lobbying by T. Boone Pickens and his Pickens Plan "Army," as he calls it. The Center for Media and Democracy unveiled the fact that, by and large, the bill was written by the "natural" gas industry and its lobbyists.

edit  

Key State News

  • Pennsylvania: On February 14, 2012, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett signed into law Act 13, which Alternet reporter Steven Rosenfeld said could be "the nation's worst corporate giveaway." The law benefits the "natural" gas industry in a host of ways. It revokes local zoning authority to discourage oil and gas development. Under the law, municipalities can adopt rules on drilling, but cannot ban it. They must also revise local ordinances to allow drilling in order to receive payment under the new per-well impact fee. The law allows the state’s Public Utilities Commission to overturn local zoning and decide whether a community is eligible for a share in impact fee revenues. It also gives the "natural" gas industry the ability to seize private property for a drilling operation.
  • Ohio: On New Year’s Eve 2011, a 4.0 magnitude earthquake was recorded in Ohio. This and a series of other quakes in the region have been linked to a disposal well for injecting wastewater used in the fracking process by seismologists at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. Wastewater from the fracking process is either recycled or trucked off site to be injected in a deep underground well. As the pressurized water is pushed below ground it can cause earthquakes on ancient faultlines. In response to the findings, the state is considering tougher rules on drilling. Governor John Kasich has been a strong proponent of fracking.
  • New York: In 2010, a moratorium on fracking in the state was put in place, but a plan to lift it, advanced by Governor Andrew Cuomo, could change this. The New York Department of Environmental Conservation received thousands of comments from the public in response to these plans to open up 85 percent of the state to fracking. The open comment period ended in January 2012 and the decision is expected to follow in a few months. In June 2012 the New York Times reported that, according to senior officials at the State Department of Environmental Conservation, Gov. Cuomo would likely limit drilling to the deepest areas of the Marcellus Shale rock formation — primarily Broome, Chemung, Chenango, Steuben and Tioga Counties. Drilling would be permitted only in towns that agree to it, and would be banned in Catskill Park, aquifers, and nationally designated historic districts. The strategy has not been made final and details could change, contingent on hydraulic fracturing receiving final approval from state regulators.[2] Critics say drilling would primarily take place in economically distressed areas in need of the funds, raising issues of environmental justice.[3]
  • Wyoming: In December 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency linked chemicals from fracking and groundwater pollution in Wyoming. This is the first time that the federal agency has drawn these conclusions. "Gasland" Director Josh Fox was arrested while trying to film a House Science Committee hearing on the EPA's investigation of this possible water contamination in Pavillion, Wyoming.
  • Vermont: In January 2012, the House Water Resources committee approved a bill that would put a three-year moratorium on fracking in Vermont.
  • Wisconsin: While there is no actual fracking in the state, Wisconsin has become a target for the oil and gas industry for its silica sand. The sand is injected in the ground, along with the water and chemicals, and is used to hold open the crevices while the gas and oil is released. The sand is most easily accessible in the state of Wisconsin, which means the industry is looking to scrape the Midwestern state of it's rolling hills by extracting its sand. This new scramble for sand mining has local residents concerned about the health and environmental impacts on their communities.
  • North Carolina: Fracking is currently not allowed in North Carolina, but the state is in the process of studying the potential impacts of it with the final report expected in May.
  • California: The Monterey Shale, located in California, is five times larger than the Eagle Ford shale in Texas. The US Energy Information Association believes there are 15.4 billion barrels of oil to be extracted in the shale, which equals about 64% of all recoverable shale oil in the continental U.S. The shale runs from northern California to Los Angeles. While fracking has not been widely used, land is starting to be leased to start with the process. In December 2011, The Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club filed a lawsuit challenging the federal Bureau of Land Management's leasing of more than 2,500 acres in Monterey and Fresno counties for oil and gas development, which would include fracking.
  • Texas: New Texas fracking disclosure rules went into effect February 2012, which required drillers to reveal the amount of water needed for each oil and gas well and the chemicals used in the process.
  • Michigan: Devon Energy, an energy company based in Oklahoma, received $2.2 billion from China in January 2012 to expand it's fracking operations, particularly in Michigan.
edit  

Spotlight on Campaign Donations and Lobbying

In a study titled "Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets: The Campaign Contributions and Lobbying Expenditures of the Natural Gas Industry in Pennsylvania," Common Cause documented the flow of money from the oil and gas industry to Pennsylvania politicians, and how it impacted their behaviors. The report reveals that the "natural" gas industry gave $2.85 million to political candidates in Pennsylvania between 2001 and 2010, with the campaign contributions increasing particularly post 2005, and 2008. In addition, the report revealed that the industry spent $4.2 million on lobbying since 2007. The authors write that the state has no real limit to campaign contributions and that the data is not easily searchable by citizens.

The report reveals that Tom Corbett, the current Republican Governor of Pennsylvania received over $360,000 in industry contributions since 2001, which is over three and a half times the amount of contributions received by any other politician in the state. Corbett's opponent in the 2010 race for governor, Dan Onorato, received roughly $60,000 in campaign funding, putting him at seventh on the list of top 25 recipients of industry contributions from 2001 through April 2010. Former Democratic Governor Ed Rendell received over $84,000 in campaign contributions from the gas and oil industry since 2001, and has called himself the industry's "best ally," even though the industry gave nearly four time as much in contributions to his opponent. Republicans received 84% of contributions ($2.28 million) and Democrats received 16% ($428,000), according to Common Cause.

Common Cause has since created a campaign finance database dedicated to tracking the vast influence of money from "natural" gas drilling companies in the state-level elections in the state of Pennsylvania. According to the database, $3,442,212 was donated to elected officials currently in office in PA. The top recipient for the 2010 election was Governor Tom Corbett, with a total $1,634,096 recieved in contributions from the "natural" gas industry. He was followed by Senate President Pro Tempore Joseph Scarnati, who received $293,333.

Common Cause of New York released a three-part series called "Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets: Expenditures of the Natural Gas Industry in New York to Influence Public Policy." The decision on whether to allow fracking in New York is still under review. The report is intended to "assist the public in monitoring this difficult decision and how it is made, Common Cause/New York has continued and expanded its analysis of lobbying expenditures by those who seek to influence this critical decision." The report reveals that the most active lobbying efforts in New York were put forth by Exxon, Chesapeake Energy, and Cabot Oil and Gas. These companies have melded together as a collective "trade association" that goes by the name of Independent Oil and Gas Association, resembling Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale Coalition.

The second piece of the report shows that Chesapeake Energy, the nation’s second largest producer of "natural" gas, was the biggest spender among industry advocates of fracking, disclosing a total of $1,090,051 spent lobbying in NY in 2010. "[By] contrast, the biggest spender amongthe groups that supported the moratorium, Citizens Campaign for the Environment, an entity which lobbies onnumerous environmental issues, not only natural gas exploitation, spent $159,232 lobbying in 2010."


edit  

We need YOUR help

Help us uncover the oil and gas industry's public relations and propaganda efforts behind the push for fracking. If you see an ad from a company or front group minimizing the consequences of drilling for oil and gas in shale, please contact our new tipline: tipline AT sourcewatch.org. Help us research the profits, executive pay, lobbying expenditures and safety records of the companies pushing to expand shale oil and gas drilling. Here is a research guide on:

A list of corporations that deserve greater scrutiny (there are dozens of corporations listed on the Marcellus Shale page):

edit  

Links to Related Issues

Fracking Pages on SourceWatch

Purge server cache
Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found