| SourceWatch needs your financial support to survive and thrive. If you've found this information on the people, organizations, and issues shaping the public agenda helpful, please make a tax-deductible donation now. |
Telecommunications Act of 1996
From SourceWatch
| This article is a stub (under development) and part of WellConnected on SourceWatch, a project of the Center for Public Integrity's Well Connected Project and the Center for Media and Democracy. The project tracks media ownership and influence and changes in U.S. telecom, media and intellectual property policy.
While all articles on the wiki are constantly evolving, this article is just getting started. |
| This article is part of Congresspedia's Communications, Science and Intellectual Property Policy (U.S.) Portal. Help out by joining the working group. |
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Govtrack) was the first major overhaul of telecommunications law in 60 years and included major concessions to the broadcast industry. In the bill, lawmakers limited eligibility for DTV licenses to existing broadcasters. In addition, Congress and the FCC provided each broadcaster with a second six MHz spectrum license, effectively doubling their spectrum holdings. The idea was to allow broadcasters to offer analog and digital signals on two separate channels during a transition period and when enough consumers made the switch, broadcasters would return their analog channels and roll out enhanced programming such as HDTV or multicasting on the digital channels. [1] (DTV signals can't be received through the existing analog broadcasting infrastructure, known as NTSC). [2]
- Main article: Digital television
The consumer activist Ralph Nader referred to these concessions as "one of the single biggest giveaways in U.S. corporate welfare history." [3] The spectrum was estimated to be worth between $11 billion and $70 billion. [4] Even the onetime GOP presidential candidate, former Sen. Bob Dole, R-Kansas, came out vehemently against the handout: "We don't give away trees to newspaper publishers. Why should we give away more airwaves to broadcasters?" he wrote in a 1997 editorial published in The New York Times. "The airwaves are a natural resource. They do not belong to the broadcasters, phone companies or any other industry. They belong to the American people." [5]
Contents |
Articles and Resources
Related SourceWatch resources
- See the other articles at the Telecom, Media and Intellectual Property Policy (U.S.) portal.
- See the related Congresspedia article on Digital television.
- See the related Congresspedia article on Spectrum.
Sources
- ↑ Blair Levin et al., 700 MHz: A Pivotal Auction Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc., March 2, 2007.
- ↑ Lennard Kruger, Digital Television: An Overview, Congressional Research Service, updated Jan. 23, 2007.
- ↑ Ralph Nader, Testimony Before the House Committee on the Budget Nader.org, June 30, 1999.
- ↑ Ralph Nader, Testimony Before the House Committee on the Budget Nader.org, June 30, 1999.
- ↑ Bob Dole, Giving Away the Airwaves The New York Times, March 27, 1997.
External Resources
- Lennard Kruger, The Digital TV Transition: A Brief Overview Congressional Research Service, Aug. 12, 2005.
- Lennard Kruger, Digital Television: An Overview Congressional Research Service, updated Jan. 23, 2007.


