United States and fracking

From SourceWatch
Jump to: navigation, search

This article is part of the FrackSwarm portal on SourceWatch, a project of CoalSwarm and the Center for Media and Democracy. To search by topic or location, click here.

This article is part of the FrackSwarm coverage of fracking.
Sub-articles:
Related articles:

Fracking, or Hydraulic fracturing, is the propagation of fractures in a rock layer caused by the presence of a pressurized fluid. Hydraulic fractures form naturally, as in the case of veins or dikes, and is one means by which gas and petroleum from source rocks may migrate to reservoir rocks. This process is used to release petroleum, natural gas (including shale gas, tight gas and coal seam gas), or other substances for extraction, via a technique called induced hydraulic fracturing, often shortened to fracking or hydrofracking.[1] This type of fracturing, known colloquially as a 'frac job',[2] creates fractures from a wellbore drilled into reservoir rock formations. A distinction can be made between low-volume hydraulic fracturing used to stimulate high-permeability reservoirs, which may consume typically 20000 to 80000 gallons of fluid per well, with high-volume hydraulic fracturing, used in the well completion of tight gas and shale gas wells; high-volume hydraulic fracturing can use as much as 3 gallons of fluid per well.[3] This latter practice has come under scrutiny internationally, with some countries suspending or even banning it. The first frac job was performed in 1947,[1] though the current fracking technique was first used in the late 1990s in the Barnett Shale in Texas.[4] The energy from the injection of a highly-pressurized fracking fluid creates new channels in the rock which can increase the extraction rates and ultimate recovery of fossil fuels.

According to the International Energy Agency, the global use of natural gas will rise by more than 50% compared to 2010 levels, and account for over 25% of world energy demand in 2035.[5] Proponents of fracking point to the vast amounts of formerly inaccessible hydrocarbons the process can extract. However, there remain large uncertainties in the amount of gas reserves that can be accessed in this way.[6] Detractors point to possible Environment (biophysical)|environmental impacts, including contamination of ground water,[7][8] risks to air quality,[9][10] the migration of gases and hydraulic fracturing chemicals to the surface,[11][12] surface contamination from spills and flowback and the health effects of these.[13][14]

In 2010 fracking industry generated $76 billion in revenues, and put the U.S. on track to possibly become a gas exporter.[15]

As fracking for oil and natural gas intensifies across the United States, CoalSwarm is developing information on the industry, the environmental and health impacts of fracking, legislative and regulatory activity, and citizen action. For state-by-state information on fracking click on the map below:

Alabama and fracking Alaska and fracking Arizona and fracking Arkansas and fracking California and fracking Colorado and fracking Connecticut and fracking Delaware and fracking Florida and fracking Georgia and fracking Hawaii and fracking Idaho and fracking Illinois and fracking Indiana and fracking Iowa and fracking Kansas and fracking Kentucky and fracking Louisiana and fracking Maine and fracking Maryland and fracking Massachusetts and fracking Michigan and fracking Minnesota and fracking Mississippi and fracking Missouri and fracking Montana and fracking Nebraska and fracking Nevada and fracking New Hampshire and fracking New Jersey and fracking New Mexico and fracking New York and fracking North Carolina and fracking North Dakota and fracking Ohio and fracking Oklahoma and fracking Oregon and fracking Pennsylvania and fracking Rhode Island and fracking South Carolina and fracking South Dakota and fracking Tennessee and fracking Texas and fracking Utah and fracking Vermont and fracking Virginia and fracking Washington State and fracking West Virginia and fracking Wisconsin and fracking Wyoming and fracking Delaware and fracking Maryland and fracking New Hampshire and fracking New Jersey and fracking Massachusetts and fracking Connecticut and fracking West Virginia and fracking Vermont and fracking Rhode Island and frackingMap of USA with state names.png
About this image

National legislation

776px-Shaleusa2.jpg
  • The Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act (H.R. 2766), (S. 1215)--was introduced to both houses of the the United States Congress on June 9, 2009, and aims to repeal the exemption for hydraulic fracturing in the Safe Drinking Water Act.[16]

Companies

Shale gas and fracking

Because shales ordinarily have insufficient permeability to allow significant fluid flow to a well bore, most shales are not commercial sources of natural gas. Shale gas is one of a number of unconventional sources of natural gas; other unconventional sources of natural gas include coalbed methane, tight sandstones, and methane hydrates. Shale gas areas are often known as resource plays[17] (as opposed to exploration plays). The geological risk of not finding gas is low in resource plays, but the potential profits per successful well are usually also lower.

GasDepositDiagram.jpg

Shale has low matrix permeability, so gas production in commercial quantities requires fractures to provide permeability. Shale gas has been produced for years from shales with natural fractures; the shale gas boom in recent years has been due to modern technology in hydraulic fracturing (fracking) to create extensive artificial fractures around well bores.

Horizontal drilling is often used with shale gas wells, with lateral lengths up to 10000 feet within the shale, to create maximum borehole surface area in contact with the shale.

Shales that host economic quantities of gas have a number of common properties. They are rich in organic material (0.5% to 25%),[18] and are usually mature petroleum source rocks in the thermogenic gas window, where high heat and pressure have converted petroleum to natural gas. They are sufficiently brittle and rigid enough to maintain open fractures. In some areas, shale intervals with high natural gamma radiation are the most productive, as high gamma radiation is often correlated with high organic carbon content.

Some of the gas produced is held in natural fractures, some in pore spaces, and some is adsorbed onto the organic material. The gas in the fractures is produced immediately; the gas adsorbed onto organic material is released as the formation pressure is drawn down by the well.

Economics

Although shale gas has been produced for more than 100 years in the Appalachian Basin and the Illinois Basin of the United States, the wells were often marginally economical. Higher natural-gas prices in recent years and advances in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal completions have made shale-gas wells more profitable.[19] As of June 2011, the validity of the claims of economic viability of these wells has begun to be publicly questioned.[20] Shale gas tends to cost more to produce than gas from conventional wells, because of the expense of the massive hydraulic fracturing treatments required to produce shale gas, and of horizontal drilling. However, this is often offset by the low risk of shale-gas wells. A 2012 article estimated that the UK may have offshore shale gas reserves of 1000 cubic feet compared to UK gas consumption of 3.5 cubic feet per year. However the cost of extracting this gas with existing technology would be probably be more than $200 per barrel of oil equivalent (UK North Sea oil prices were about $120 per barrel in April 2012).[21]

North America has been the leader in developing and producing shale gas. The great economic success of the Barnett Shale play in Texas in particular has spurred the search for other sources of shale gas across the United States and Canada.

Research has calculated the 2011 worth of the global shale-gas market as $26.66bn.[22]

However, a June, 2011 New York Times investigation of industrial emails and internal documents found that the financial benefits of unconventional shale gas extraction may be less than previously thought, due to companies intentionally overstating the productivity of their wells and the size of their reserves.[23]

Fracking's economic impact on North Dakota economy

Oil production in North Dakota's section of the Bakken formation accounts for six percent of domestic production in the state and is largely responsible for reversing two decades of declining oil production. Currently North Dakota is running a surplus economy. According to the North Dakota Petroleum Council, crude oil taxes on production and extraction averaged 10.3 percent in 2010, bringing in $749.5 million in state revenues. Additionally, the industry spent $1.49 billion in taxable sales and purchases. In 2010 natural gas brought in over $10.1 million in extraction taxes.

On the downside, it has been reported that as a result of the oil boom in North Dakota that "inadequate housing and crime" are emerging concerns for the state.[24] In an investigative report on life in the town of Williston, the biggest Bakken boom down in North Dakota, journalist Mark Ebner writes:

"There’s not a motel room to be had in the city, housing prices are double what they were a year ago ($300,000 for a two-bedroom home), and the daily onslaught of new arrivals is reduced to living in their cars, RVs, sporadic tent cities or the rapidly proliferating “man camps” – clusters of trailers in an open field that pack in oil patch workers dormitory style, sometimes six to a room. Access to running water and simple sanitation is so rare that public businesses have had to lock their bathrooms to discourage makeshift sponge baths or the dumping of wastewater"[25]

In April 2012 a study conducted by Headwaters Economics concluded it would be beneficial if the state of North Dakota funneled more oil and natural gas tax revenues to communities in the pathway of Bakken and hints at increasing the state tax rate on oil and gas development, which could in turn help these growing communities pay for roads, schools and other infrastructure. Currently North Dakota does not have the policies in place to reap the full economic benefits of the Bakken oil boom.[26]

Lobbying and political donations

The Environment News Service reported that, from 1990 - 2011, oil and gas companies contributed $238.7 million into gubernatorial and Congressional election campaigns to persuade lawmakers that fracking is safe. The fracking industry spending especially targeted oversight - members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Republican candidates received at least three times more cash than Democratic candidates. Top Congressional recipients include:

The industry spent an additional $726 million on lobbying from 2001.[27]

Citizen groups

Industry groups

Resources

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Charlez, Philippe A. (1997). Rock Mechanics: Petroleum Applications. Paris: Editions Technip, 239]. 
  2. Definition of frac job. Oilfield Glossary. Schlumberger. Retrieved on 22 February 2012.
  3. Anthony Andrews et al. (30 October 2009). Unconventional Gas Shales: Development, Technology, and Policy Issues (PDF), Congressional Research Service, ?. Retrieved on 22 February 2012. 
  4. Bill McKibben (8 March 2012). "Why Not Frack?". The New York Review of Books 59 (4). Retrieved on 21 February 2012. 
  5. "World Energy Outlook 2011: Are We Entering a Golden Age of Gas?" (PDF), International Energy Agency (9 November 2011), pp. ?. Retrieved on 3 March 2012. "Based on the assumptions of the GAS Scenario, from 2010 gas use will rise by more than 50% and account for over 25% of world energy demand in 2035—surely a prospect to designate the Golden Age of Gas." 
  6. Ian Urbina (28 January 2012). "New Report by Agency Lowers Estimates of Natural Gas in U.S.". Retrieved on 23 February 2012. 
  7. Fact-Based Regulation for Environmental Protection in Shale Gas Development (PDF). Retrieved on 29 February 2012.
  8. Incidents where hydraulic fracturing is a suspected cause of drinking water contamination. U.S. NRDC (December 2011). Retrieved on 23 February 2012.
  9. Powell, Devin (24 March 2012). "Natural gas wells leakier than believed. Measurements at Colorado site show methane release higher than previous estimates" 181(6). Science News Magazine for the Society of Science and the Public. 
  10. Howarth, Robert W.; Santoro, Renee; Ingraffea (13 March 2012). "Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations". Climatic Change (open access via Springerlink). 
  11. Susan Phillips (8 December 2011). EPA Blames Fracking for Wyoming Groundwater Contamination. StateImpact Penn­syl­va­nia. WITF, WHYY & NPR. Retrieved on 6 February 2012.
  12. Osborn, Stephen G. (2011-05-09). "Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100682108. Retrieved on 2011-10-14. 
  13. Investigation of Ground Water Contamination near Pavillion, Wyoming (PDF). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  14. David Biello (30 March 2010). What the Frack? Natural Gas from Subterranean Shale Promises U.S. Energy Independence--With Environmental Costs. Scientific American. Retrieved on 21 February 2012.
  15. "Fracking brings boom, fears to rural U.S." Veronique Dupont, Mother Nature Network, April 22, 2012.
  16. "The 'Fracking' Of Ohio State Parks" Progress Ohio, March 16, 2011.
  17. Dan Jarvie, "Worldwide shale resource plays," PDF file, NAPE Forum, 26 August 2008.
  18. US Department of Energy, "Modern shale gas development in the United States," April 2009, p.17.
  19. Simon Mauger, Dana Bozbiciu (2011). How Changing Gas Supply Cost Leads to Surging Production. Retrieved on 10 May 2011.
  20. Ian Urbina (25 June 2011). "Insiders Sound an Alarm Amid a Natural Gas Rush", The New York Times. Retrieved on 26 June 2011. 
  21. Gloyston, Henning and Johnstone, Christopher (17 April 2012) Exclusive - UK has vast shale gas reserves, geologists say Reuters Edition UK, Accessed 17 April 2012
  22. The Shale Gas Market Report 2011-2021 [1] - visiongain
  23. Urbina, Ian (25 June 2011). "Insiders Sound an Alarm Amid a Natural Gas Rush". Retrieved on 28 June 2011. ; Urbina, Ian (27 June 2011). "S.E.C. Shift Leads to Worries of Overestimation of Reserves". Retrieved on 28 June 2011. 
  24. "To frack or not to frack: North Dakota's dilemma" Brian A. Shactman, CNBC.com, February 10, 2012.
  25. "FRACKED UP!: Hollywood,Interrupted Visits America’s New Boomtown" Mark Ebner, Hollywood Interrupted, April 24, 2012.
  26. "N.D. must prepare now for the end of the Bakken boom -- study" Scott Streater, E&E News, April 25, 2012.
  27. Sharon Guynup, "The Fracking Industry Buys Congress," ENS, Feb. 16, 2012.

Related SourceWatch articles

External links

Wikipedia also has an article on United States and fracking. This article may use content from the Wikipedia article under the terms of the GFDL.