Plum Point Energy Station
From SourceWatch
 |
| This article is part of the Coal Issues portal on SourceWatch, a project of CoalSwarm and the Center for Media and Democracy. |
Plum Point Energy Associates (PPES) – a member of LS Power Development – began construction of a 665 MW coal plant in Osceola, Arkansas in March 2007. The plant sits near the Mississippi River and will consist of a subcritical unit that will burn coal from the Powder River Basin.
In 2006, the East Texas Electric Cooperative (ETEC), Inc acquired 50 MW ownership of PPES, Southwestern Electric Cooperative acquired 70 MW ownership of PPES,[1], the Empire District Electric Co. paid $87 million for 50 megawatts of the plant[2] and the Municipal Energy Agency of Mississippi acquired an undivided ownership stake in the plant.
Empire District Electric also agreed to buy an additional 50 megawatts "with an option to convert those megawatts into an ownership stake in 2015."[2]
ETEC was turned away by the Rural Utilities Service when the agency issued a moratorium on new loans for coal-fired power plants in early 2008. The co-op filed a federal lawsuit over the moratorium and is seeking alternate financing from the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) at a slightly higher rate than the original RUS loan.[3]
In March 2008, PPES applied to the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality for modifications to the air permit in order to construct an additional 665-MW pulverized coal boiler at its Plum Point Power Station. The proposed Unit II would share some facilities with Unit I under a third ownership. As a result, there are three separate applications pending before the ADEQ: a renewal of the combined permit for Unit I, a separate permit for combined facilities, a separate permit for the Unit II facilities.[4]
On August 26,2008 the Sierra Club submitted a letter to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its Rural Utilities Service (RUS), claiming that they are in violation of federal law by approving investments in a number of new coal-fired projects without assessing environmental impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The plants in question include the proposed Hempstead Turk plant and the Plum Point Energy Station. On September 25, East Texas Electric Cooperative (ETEC) filed a suit against the Sierra Club and USDA, claiming that USDA failed to process approvals related to the plants due to the threat of legal action.[5]
In December 2008, Dynegy CEO Bruce Williamson announced that the company was reevaluating its role in developing new power plants, including Plum Point. Williamson cited the tightening credit markets and difficulty in permitted new coal plants as reasons for reconsidering its involvement in the siting, permitting, financing and construction of several new projects. Other plants include the Longleaf plant in Georgia, LS Power Elk Run Energy Station in Iowa, Midland Power Plant in Michigan, Sandy Creek Plant in Texas, West Deptford Project in New Jersey, and White Pine Energy Station in Nevada. As an alternative, the company will look at adding generation to its existing sites in the Northeast, Midwest and Western U.S.[6]
According to an April 2009 update from the Sierra Club, Plum Point has submitted remaining air modeling files for Unit II and the air permit application for the plant is now pending before the ADEQ.[7]
Contents |
Project Details
Sponsor: LS Power Development
Location: Osceola, AR
Capacity: 1330 MW
Type: Subcritical
Projected in service: 2010 (Unit I),
Status: Unit I: Construction; Unit II: Proposed
Financing
Resources
References
- ↑ "LS Power Group Completes Coal Plant Capacity Sale," St. Louis Business Journal, December 7, 2006.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 "L.S. Power unit inks $87M power plant deal", St. Louis Business Journal, March 15, 2006.
- ↑ "Loss of federal loan fails to derail four other coal-fired power plants," Great Falls Tribune, October 18, 2008.
- ↑ "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed October 2008.
- ↑ "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed October 2008.
- ↑ "Dynegy to rethink new coal-fired power projects," Reuters, December 11, 2008.
- ↑ "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed May 2009. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)
Related SourceWatch resources
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Existing U.S. Coal Plants
- US proposed coal plants (both active and cancelled)
- Coal plants cancelled in 2007
- Coal plants cancelled in 2008
- Arkansas and coal
- Profiles of other states (or click on the map)
External links
- "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed December 2007. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)
- "Tracking New Coal-Fired Power Plants: Coal's Resurgence in Electric Power Generation", National Energy Tech Lab, May 2007, page 9. (Pdf)
- "MEAM Buys Into Plum Point," Mississippi Business Journal, September 25, 2006. (This is only a small extract. The full story is behind a subscription screen or can be accessed as part of a free trial).
